Shubman Gill Tactics Criticized after Anshul Kamboj’s new ball misstep in the Manchester Test has once again sparked the debate, with many experts pointing out that Shubman Gill Tactics Criticized during key decision-making moments.
Experts Slam Shubman Gill’s Decision to Give New Ball to Anshul Kamboj Over Siraj
The Manchester Test between India and England took a dramatic turn on Day 1 when India’s bowling plans came under fire. Despite scoring a competitive 358 over six sessions, India’s effort with the ball fell flat and the spotlight fell directly on young skipper Shubman Gill.
In a surprising move, Shubman Gill handed the new ball to debutant Anshul Kamboj instead of experienced pacer Mohammed Siraj. The decision backfired as Kamboj gave away 17 runs in just three overs, including three boundaries in his very first over. He was quickly removed from the attack and replaced by Siraj.
The move sparked immediate backlash from cricketing legends, with Shubman Gill Tactics Criticized heavily across media platforms. Ricky Ponting, speaking on Sky Sports, was among the first to express his disapproval:
“I think they were tactically off as well. Kamboj shouldn’t have taken the new ball. I didn’t like that from the start. Five of Duckett’s first six boundaries were behind square leg, so tactically they were wrong. I think Bumrah is bowling from the wrong end too.”
Ponting added that Bumrah should have bowled from the more successful Statham End instead of the James Anderson End, where he was far less effective.
Former England captain Nasser Hussain echoed Ponting’s concerns.
“They bowled really poorly. Too many balls on the pads, not enough in that channel. Captain’s decisions I didn’t quite agree with, to be honest. Kamboj wasn’t even in the squad a week ago. Giving him the new ball ahead of Siraj seems odd.”
Hussain believed India lacked a clear strategy and questioned the wisdom of thrusting a debutant into such a high-pressure role so early. While Kamboj did redeem himself by dismissing Ben Duckett for 94 — his maiden Test wicket it came only after England had already amassed a 166-run opening partnership in 32 overs.
Stuart Broad, too, joined the chorus of disapproval.
“Really poor. When your batters get you a slightly above-par score, you’ve got a responsibility to back them up. The number of balls down the leg side… it was unacceptable at Test match level.”
By the close of play, England had marched to 225/2 in just 46 overs, largely dominating the Indian attack. Despite India’s solid batting display, the day was overshadowed by poor execution with the ball — and, more importantly, questionable captaincy decisions.
With Shubman Gill Tactics Criticized widely by pundits, questions are now being raised about India’s leadership approach and strategic decisions in overseas conditions. Whether Gill can bounce back and learn from this moment remains to be seen, but this was a harsh lesson on the importance of experience, execution, and clarity under pressure.
As the Test continues, India will have to fight not just England’s batting firepower, but also the consequences of their own tactical missteps. The phrase Shubman Gill Tactics Criticized may now become a key talking point in analyzing the future of his leadership role.
READ MORE: Bad news for RCB fans, M. Chinnaswamy Stadium declared unsafe to host after stampede controversy
FAQ
Q1. Why is Shubman Gill being criticized in the Manchester Test?
Gill is being criticized for giving the new ball to debutant Anshul Kamboj instead of experienced pacer Mohammed Siraj, which allowed England to dominate early.
Q2. How did Anshul Kamboj perform in his opening spell?
He conceded 17 runs in three overs and was taken out of the attack. However, he later took the wicket of Ben Duckett.
Q3. What did Ricky Ponting say about the bowling strategy?
Ponting said India’s tactics were off, blaming the decision to give Kamboj the new ball and suggesting Bumrah bowled from the wrong end.
Q4. What was Nasser Hussain’s take on Gill’s captaincy?
Hussain found Gill’s decision odd and criticized the inconsistency in line and length from India’s pacers.
